Alternet: Ann Neumann’s Disingenuous Complaints About the State of the Euthanasia Debate

There’s a fresh piece from Ann Neumann on Alternet, bemoaning the way the euthanasia debate in the UK – and here in the US – has become another aspect of the “Culture Wars.” 

As mentioned in an earlier post, there has been a flood of pro-euthanasia coverage in the UK.  It’s even got Ann Neumann, who is pretty much a zealot on the subject, rolling her eyes a bit.

Here’s an excerpt from What Britain’s Assisted Suicide Should Teach Us:

All this attention on the issue of assisted suicide has made for some widely-read and sensational news.  But, as Peter Beresford blogs at the Guardian today, the war over assisted suicide has done little to address the practical, non-contentious issues surrounding assisted suicide.

What would those issues be and who would speak about them?  Well, Neumann has ideas on that – and read carefully to note just who she leaves out:

When you’re in a culture war, there is no DMZ.  And everybody is an “independent advocate.”  Who do you ask for that safe space?  The government?  The media?  The church?  The medical profession?  Because other end of life care issues have been framed into the assisted suicide debate, they can’t be addressed in a rational, meaningful way.  Is the solution increased public education?  A broader coalition for patients’ right?

(She also blames a lot of the discourse on well-funded “pro-life” groups, as though the membership of pro-euthanasia organizations consisted of poor people on public assistance instead of affluent members of society giving hefty cash donations.)

Anyway, if you’re here and you’re reading this – it’s obvious who she left out.  Disability advocates and activists – in the US and the UK – oppose legalization of euthanasia and assisted suicide.  The “practical” issues she and Beresford refer to are exactly the economic, social and support factors that disability advocates constantly bring up as being central to any discussion of assisted suicide and euthanasia.

And Neumann already knows this – or she should.  She found her way to Bill Peace’s Bad Cripple blog last month, but shied away from engaging from the critique of her initial attacks on what she termed “slippery slope” arguments on the blog.  Not long after that, she announced the news of the Disability and Health Journal Issue on Assisted Suicide on her own blog.

So she knows that disability activists and advocates are out there, talking about the “practical” things.  The trouble is, we think legalization of assisted suicide and euthanasia is bad policy. 

In other words, she’s fostering and promoting the very polarization that she bemoans.  Maybe it’s because she really isn’t sorry that assisted suicide is seen as a “culture wars” issue after all.

She’s wrong about that DMZ – we live in it.  And neither the pro-euthanasia activists nor the highly political “pro-life” organizations want to acknowledge our place in the debate, because we’d distract from their Culture War.  Neither side really sees people with disabilities as having a place in their respective cultures, so it’s easy to marginalize us – and both sides do it with abandon and ease.

I hate ending on a sour note like this.  If you want a solid reality check on what is going on in the UK, please check out the newest column from Disability Bitch.  DB’s column generally revolves around what and who she hates – just about everyone and everything (although with an admitted soft spot for fellow bitch Heather Mills).

Things are bad indeed in the UK – so bad that the DB’s column this week announces that “Disability Bitch Loves Life”:

(referring to her “no-legged friend”):

Yesterday, he told me I would have to wait until he’d finished reading about the new crippled actress in Coronation Street before he’d get me dinner.

That was enough. “I’m hurting here,” I told him. “Have some compassion.”

“OK,” he said. “Would you like me to smother you to death with a pillow?”

Goodness. It took a moment’s thought. “No,” I said, “but it would be great if you could pass me some ibuprofen.”

He looked surprised but, eventually, shuffled off to the kitchen to get my supplies, checking I only wanted two anti-inflammatory capsules and not, you know, two hundred.

It seems a good moment to reiterate that I LOVE LIFE. I don’t normally bother saying such things, but then, people have been stating the obvious a lot lately. Only a few days ago, I heard someone from a pro life campaign group telling ITV news, “Killing people is illegal.” It seems the world needs reminding of these simple things.

So, for the sake of clarity: I’m Disability Bitch, and I do hate the world and everything in it, but I don’t want to die anytime soon. It’s no surprise my No-Legged mate thinks I might want to glide off this mortal coil sooner rather than later. The thing is, I don’t. I quite like being here. 

 

If you examine the current British news agenda, you’d think this is a rare emotion for someone disabled and living in pain. See, every single major news story relating to disabled people in the last month or so has been on the subject of voluntary euthanasia, culminating in this week’s headline that, several years ago, veteran BBC journalist Ray Gosling admitted publicly to killing a lover who was dying of AIDS. We know because he announced as much on a BBC regional documentary filmed several months ago which was only broadcast this week.

Call me old fashioned, but I’d always assumed that if I mentioned to my employer that I once deliberately suffocated someone, they might, y’know, call the police and report the event. Instead, the so called mercy killings of terminally ill or disabled people have become humdrum with him talking openly about it in radio and TV slots the next day. At time of writing, Mr Gosling has been arrested on suspicion of murder. 

That’s just an excerpt.  Read the rest here.

I’d like to see the situation improve, but when you consider the combined efforts of the media, pro-euthanasia lobbyists, and the religious advocates – none of whom seem inclined to point to the relevance of disability advocates in this debate – I’m afraid the poor Bitch may have to remind people that she really loves life in the future.  –Stephen Drake

3 thoughts on “Alternet: Ann Neumann’s Disingenuous Complaints About the State of the Euthanasia Debate

  1. Stephen, from my perspective I do not perceive there to be an “abandonment” of disabled groups by pro-life organizations. My first awareness of this blog came from National Right to Life & NDY has been quoted numerous times in their newsletters.

    There are always some conflicts between different organizations in a coalition. I respect NDY enormously and read this blog avidly (I am not disabled but my son has autism) but I also think that the carping at right-to-life organizations does not serve the cause well and misses the mark.

    Sorry but I needed to be honest.

  2. Oh, I like it a lot, Stephen, that you ended with the comments of someone using the “b” word. I’m counting down to 7 0 (approximately ten days away because there’s no Leap Year Day this year, drat). I’m disabled by severe ME/CFS. I just got some art done to mark my birthday (and put in text that the art is in memory of Howard Zinn and my apology to the people of the world for the policies of the U.S. government).

    I love living. I love bitching.
    I hope to be one of the greatest
    nags in history, or, one can call it persistence as an advocate.

    I am so happy at how people with disabilities are making lots of noise about saying “NO, we won’t go” quietly into some folks fantasy of “assisted (by murder, it’s not) suicide”. We fight for ourselves, as can, and applaud those who are writing, demonstrating, etc. for those of who can’t. I look back at my near- 70 years with no regrets.
    Is my life easy? No, but it’s mine. Like I told my doctor (of
    many decades) when he said some
    decades back re the quality of my life (due to ME/CFS, at that time undiagnosed) was terrible: It’s the only life I’ve got and I’m making the most of it.

    Final note: I have recently heard from two artists who I’ve known for almost 25 years, but not
    heard from in about two years.
    The last time I had heard from one,
    she was going blind in addition to her severe neurological disease, and I thought it was from diabetes, which she has as well.
    Turns out: dry eye and cataracts corrected and she sees 20/20 and no glasses after life of glasses.
    My other pen-pal is soon to be 95.
    She got MS at age 70. I hadn’t heard from her since she’d been
    put into a rehab with an infection over a year ago. She’s home again and has had scribe let me know.
    The point is: good care and living at home by our own choices.

  3. Roger,

    I appreciate your comments and it’s true that some grassroots prolife bloggers highlight the efforts and perspective of disability activists.

    I don’t know if you’ve noticed or not, but NRL isn’t as visible in these issues as it used to be. NRL did indeed highlight NDY’s work along with the work of other disability activists. When NRL is engaged in dealing with assisted suicide, it sticks to that. When dealing with other “prolife” issues it does so separately.

    Over the past few years, other organizations have been more at the forefront. When they engage in debate on the topic – they do so as part of a “culture wars” menu – anti-gay, anti-abortion, and anti-euthanasia. And that is in order of importance, judging from the money spent last election cycle and the passion behind voting drives.

    I need to be honest too. –Stephen

Comments are closed.